Share This Page

About This Blogger

Brian Gilmore is a poet and public interest attorney and contributing writer with Ebony-Jet Online.

He is also a columnist with the Progressive Media Project.

Tags

beharie attrition warrant rihanna officers claim qualified orientation moreno exclusive asset distribution foundation leboeuf moderator privacy competent recipients gilmore updates discretion advice discrimination revenue besla information united reasons voice torts legal forum davis mentors racially owner general twitter oklahoma training constitution financial scott experience lawmakers department career defined breach organization dewey problems proprietary professional preparation multistate media hours laws license publish attorney context individual client georgetown gender firms commission commitment awareness opportunities procedure billable submissions allen scholarship network associate compensation association reserves lawshucks barack research rights licensing coordinator protocol seminars offensive reputation copyrights terms confirmation support providers racial prospects appellate lawyer clifford promoting recruitment mentoring money liability national success demographics stipend books social profit moderators data strategies government musings stress parties practice recruiter income mission exam bargaining offer african registration ledbetter respect environmental trial sales incorporate federal foreclosure official race list implement failure news guidelines londell family campaign studying parody maryland assignments facebook responsible sector frank contracts progress policy loan fried economy tracker private limitations resume downturn equal music creativity arab arizona damages represent hire tips legislation founder clerk employees hardship education strategic lawsuit link university source community perspective products inclusive journal relations firm track rapper backgrounds review school articles subsidiaries police partner defense admissions Thurgood group tompkins franchise roberts profession programs mortgage place effect employment exams terminate secretary cases partnership implied royalty messages hispanic disclose sampling networking statute culture calendar domestic opportunity foster jobs fellowships evidence apaba aclu student interviewing practitioners violence assessment influence licensee minority arkansas jurisdiction director voting questions lender palimony publishers infringement economic chris women websites patent benefits development scholarships judge criminal history compulsory features diverse district firings retention uniform perform borrower distribute links workplace society member class promotion iphone materials knowledge court initiative institute rhianna vision lawpod scientific policies marshall layoffs importance sports document abanet downloads haffner marketing alabama samples award hearings mumia intellectual letters workforce detroit provisions affiliates eminem justice leadership values vetting famu industry pool entertainment diversity password outline solicitor alliances identify processes hiring royalties illegal spike fired including status eeoc political business

Powered by RafCloud 2.0.2
Obama v. Supreme Court v. Health Care Law PDF Print E-mail

altAfter all of that, President Obama is not a political coward. He is ready to fight for his health care law. He wants the US Supreme Court to resolve the health care law once and for all. The law was passed in March 2010 and I find it hard to believe that already review is being requested. People languish on death row for 20 years on appeal but the health care law is set to be reviewed in less than two?  Is my name Charlie Brown? I don't believe it but politics is politics, and the system is the system. I am surprised also that Mr. Obama is seeking review of the law and is on the offensive. But here's the deal, one person told me. This is a win-win.  If the SCOTUS decides to rule that the law's individual mandate is unconstitutional, he still has a law, he just doesn't have a tax to pay for the law. The insurance companies (most folks don't know this) were for the law, because it had an individual mandate and they stood to gain 32-36 million new customers. They knew they had new obligations coming; they just wanted to know where the cash was coming from.  They got what they wanted: you, the consumer.  But if Mr.Obama wins on everything, it is a huge victory because this will bring coverage to a lot of people who had never been covered, who had been using emergency rooms as their primary physician.  I don't have an idea of where this is headed right now. I am going to go back and read the opinion from the 11th Circuit that is being appealed.  I am going to read a lot of stuff. This one is a behemoth.